The first world war were the british soldiers lions led by donkeys

The lions were not led by donkeys

The seminal and award-winning BBC Television The Great War has been described as taking a moderate approach, with co-scriptwriter John Terraine fighting against what he viewed as an oversimplification, while Liddell Hart resigned as an advising historian to the series, in an open letter to The Timesin part over a dispute with Terraine, claiming that he minimised the faults of the High Command on The Somme and other concerns regarding the treatment of Third Ypres.

Far from being havens of rigid stupidity there was a good deal of emotional intelligence in the trenches. Moreover being a general was a dangerous rank to hold. The British Army had to expand quickly.

They faced situations that no British military leader had ever encountered before. The informal style of mixing with his men adopted by Field Marshal Montgomery in the Second World War would not have worked in when social conventions were very different.

As President of the post-war British Legion Haig mixed with ex-soldiers and became extremely popular.

While this is largely inaccurate there are some examples of inept command that resulted in battlefield disaster and tragic loss of life in the First World War. The real story was how rare rebellion was given the squalor of trench life. The subtitle of this book was "Showing how victory in the Great War was achieved by those who made the fewest mistakes.

Britain and France thought they could take advantage of a weakened enemy. The aeroplane had come a long way from its incarnation as an extremely primitive assemblage of struts and canvas They led from the front.

Grierson later Sir James Grierson inwhen reporting on the Russian contingent to the Boxer Rebelliondescribing them as 'lions led by asses'. Lions led by donkeys Save "Lions led by donkeys" is a phrase popularly used to describe the British infantry of the First World War and to blame the generals who led them.

The vision we have inherited is that all the men in the trenches were waistdeep in mud and rats before going over the top to certain death in a cloud of mustard gas and bullets The ruling class is today believed to have stayed at home in their damp castles and let their gamekeepers do the dying.

Generals had to cope with feeding, clothing, and commanding this huge army - and none had any experience on this scale. The other charge routinely levelled against them is one of incompetence. Meet the generals From battlefield commanders, to administrators, fighting a war on the scale of World War One required a range of different kinds of leadership.

Haig was an excellent regimental officer who put the welfare of his men foremost. From this point onward, the result of the war was never in doubt. Prior to publication in a letter to Hugh Trevor Roperhe asked "English soldiers, lions led by donkeys etc - can you remember who said that? According to historian Brigadier Professor Richard Holmes they were "honest, brave, hard-working soldiers" fully aware of the terrible consequences of any mistakes.

The food was generally good, medical services excellent and the pay better than in the French army. Even though Germany, Russia and France suffered far worse casualties one of the war's fiercest critics was the victor of El Alamein, Field Marshal Bernard Montgomery, who said he learned how not to command as a junior officer in the First World War.

One thing everyone can agree on: Liddell Hart, who had vetted Clark's manuscript, ought to have known it.

The lions were not led by donkeys

Senile idiots and cowards? To claim Haig had no understanding of his men is wrong, although he was instinctively more at home with professional soldiers than wartime recruits. What A Lovely War, a huge hit that taught Britain to hate the generals. Strachan points out that revisionists take strong exception to the amateurs, particularly in the media, with whom they disagree, while at the same time Gary Sheffield welcomes to the revisionist cause the work of many "hobby"-ists who only later migrated to academic study.

At this time the French army was under heavy pressure from German attacks at Verdun. The blame is often placed upon the British commanders, who are accused of stupidly wasting their men in frontal attacks because they could think of nothing better to do.Home > Lions led by donkeys?

Even today, people hold strong opinions about the commanders of the British and Allied forces in the Great War. There is a range of different views: The commanders were 'donkeys'. They were incompetent and didn't take care of their soldiers, the 'lions'. They sat in safety behind the lines while they sent their.

The First World War was one of the bloodiest wars that ever happened in human history. This War started in and ended in In this war, a lot of horrifying battles took place, for example, the Battle of the Somme.

Lions led by donkeys. and more than 11, British soldiers were killed or wounded – many of them barely out of their own trenches. The British generals of the First World War. This is direct criticism against the generals, and evidence that the soldiers were ‘lions led by donkeys’.

The Commander-in-cheif Generals of the British Army during the First World War were Sir John French () and Sir Douglas Haig (! onwards). How accurate is the statement ‘Lions led by donkeys’ in relation to British Soldiers and Generals of the First World War?

In the First World War, more men died than in any other war before. The British general depicted in the caricature is one of the more controversial figures of the First World War.

He was the commander who ordered the Somme offensive in July In the battle that followed, 20, British soldiers were killed on the first day and a further 40, wounded.

The first world war were the british soldiers lions led by donkeys
Rated 3/5 based on 64 review